Ascender Safety 101

       Ascending Rappel Ropes 101

       Autoblock Misuse (ATC-Guide)

       Avalanche Safety

       Belay School - Why Dynamic Matters

       Can A Hot Belay Device Melt My Slings?

       Carabiner Off-Axis and Tri/Quad-Axial Loading

       Choosing the Right Carabiner

       Common Belay Screw-ups

       Connecting Two Slings Together

       Daisy Chain Dangers

       Dangers of Rope Worn Carabiners

       Dangers of Worn Lowering Anchors

       Do Ropes Need to Rest Between Falls

       Draws in a Gym

       Extending a Cam Sling

       Fall Factors Explained

       Full Strength Haul Loops

       Gear Doesn't Last Forever—Crampons

       Gear Doesn't Last Forever—Ice Tool Picks

       Gear Doesn't Last Forever—Slings & Draws

       Girth Hitching a Stopper

       How Sketchy Is a Sharp-Edged Carabiner?

       How Strong are Himalayan Fixed Lines?

       How Strong is the Spinner Leash?

       How To Belay, Part 1

       How To Extend a Rappel Device

       Knot Passing 101

       Rappelling - Climbing's Diciest Business

       Re-Slinging Cams

       Rethinking the Double-Loop Bowline

       Retiring Old Ropes

       Sharpie for Marking the Middle of a Rope?

       Sling Strength In Three Anchor Configurations

       Spectra versus Nylon

       Spotting for Bouldering

       Surviving Bad Weather on El Cap

       The Dangers of Modifying Your Gear

       The Dangers of Short Static Falls

       The Electric Harness Acid Test

       The Skinny on Super Light Ropes

       Top Roping is Not So Safe

       To Screamer Or Not To Screamer

       Via Ferrata

       Weakness of Nose-hooked Carabiners

       What is the Safest Rappel Knot?

       Worn Belay Loops and Retiring a Harness

Video Spotlight
Joe Kinder On the First Ascent of Bone Tomahawk (5.14d/5.15a)
Joe Kinder On the First Ascent of Bone Tomahawk (5.14d/5.15a)
Whipper of the Month
Weekend Whipper: Alastair McDowell's Los Indignados (M7) Screamer
Weekend Whipper: Alastair McDowell's Los Indignados (M7) Screamer
 

Climb Safe: Fall Factors Explained

17-May-2017
By

Art by Gustave DoréFalling is the opposite of climbing, which can explain why we apply every membrane between our ears toward getting up the rock, but dedicate precious little to hurtling down it. Falling, it seems, isn’t just to be avoided, it’s to be struck from our minds.

But fall we do. Sometimes a little, sometimes a lot. Then, we take it on blind faith that everything will work properly. The gear will hold. The rope won’t break. The belayer isn’t asleep. That edge isn’t that sharp. For the most part our systems are sound and work when we need them. Yet things do go awry. A partner of mine once fell just 20 feet and broke a half-dozen wired nuts in a row, zippering all the way to and past the hanging belay, which, whew held.

Our accidents, large and small, reinforce the need for caution. Part and parcel is education—you can’t become a safer climber withoutknowing the fundamentals. This article is the first of a new series on how to climb safer. Here, we’ll debunk (or rebunk) the elements of falling. In futureinstallments we’ll cover static versus dynamic belays, forces generated in toprope falls and more.

 

IMPACT FORCE

Like a sack of potatoes dropped earthward, when you fall, you generate energy. When you pitch off a route and come to rope-stretching halt, you, the rope, your gear and your belayer experience energy as “impact force.” When you buy a rope, notice the “maximum impact force” rating on the hangtag. For a cord to be UIAA/CE approved as a single rope, it must absorb enough energy to limit the impact force from a test fall to 2,697 pounds force. (1/2 and twin ropes are tested with lighter weights and will be discussed in future articles.) Today’s ropes have impact forces ranging from 1,600 to 2,500 pounds force. It is worth noting that the force limit is for the first drop only, and on a brand-new rope. Subsequent drops will reach higher forces, sometimes much higher, depending on how the rope is engineered. Rope stretch, or “elongation” is also a factor to weave in: more stretch usually means lower impact forces, and an increase in the distance you’ll fall.

The hangtag number for maximum impact force and elongation are rough guidelines to keep in mind, but know that a rope’s maximum force is measured on the “leader’s” end of the rope only. The forces placed on your protection and belayer are quite different. In fact, due to a little devil called the “pulley effect” (rope goes up to the pro, then down, creating an inverted “v” which multiplies the force on the pro), the load on your top piece of gear is roughly 1.66 times the force you feel (figure one, next page). This load multiplication is crucial because it can exceed your rope’s listed maximum impact force.

This doesn’t mean that your rope will break—won’t happen—but it should yellow flag micro-gear placements, old quarter-inch bolts, fixed tat and other bits of pro with relatively low breaking or pull-out strengths.

Impact forces, however, are theoretical until you get on the rock and fall, which is what the official Rock and Ice crash test dummies did. For our tests, we fell off bolted, overhanging routes and recorded the impact forces registered at the top bolt. In all we lobbed off 30 times and recorded forces from 1,100 to a jolting 2,200 pounds force, and we never fell farther than 12 feet. (You can lob your own theoretical falls and check out the impact forces by visiting www.petzl.com.) Our falls pulled up well short of the gamut of situations you can encounter, but do give you an idea of the forces involved in typical falling situations.

 

LESSONS TO REMEMBER

1. You can impact gear well beyond your rope’s maximum rating—to be safe, double or triple up marginalplacements.
2. A fall that generates as little as 1,000 pounds force on the top anchor can still pull hard on the belayer.Always position your belayer (or anchor him) so he can cope with a severe yank and not lose control of the rope.
3. After a fall, let your rope “rest” for 10 minutes to recover its elasticity. Falling, then getting back onthe rock and immediately falling again can result in escalating impact forces.

4. Think of a rope as water in a five-gallon bucket. Every time you fall, you dip out a cup in terms of energy absorption. Eventually, the bucket, and the rope’s ability to absorb energy, is drained. Track your rope’s falls, know that over time it will lose its elasticity, resulting in higher and higher impact forces, and retire it accordingly.

==

 
FALL FACTOR

Illustration by Jeremy Collins.We instinctively feel safer falling five feet 20 feet off the ground than we do lobbing five feet, 60 feet off the deck. Paradoxi­cally, how we feel and how serious the fall really is can be diametrically opposed. Due to the “fall factor,” it’s not so much how far you fall, but how much rope you have out to absorb energy.

The fall factor is the Richter Scale used to rate the severity of a fall. A higher number equals a harder fall. To determine the fall factor, divide the distance of your fall by the amount of rope that catches it. In the examples above, a five-foot fall on 20 feet of rope is a factor .25 fall (five divided by 20), while the five-foot fall on 60 feet of rope is a factor .08 fall. Since .25 is greater than .08, the fall closer to the ground generates a higher impact force than the fall higher up. You can take comfort in knowing that UIAA/CE approved ropes must survive five, factor 1.78 falls, which are difficult, though not impossible, to achieve in real life. (The maximum fall factor is 2; an example would be a 20-foot leader fall on 10 feet of rope.)

In practice, it is easy to achieve a factor .5 fall, which is a far cry from factor 2, but still severe enough to get your attention. Say you climb 24 feet up a sport route and fall below your next clip, dropping 12 feet. We replicated this and the .5 factor fall pegged the needle up to 1,700 pounds force—harsh enough to feel in your guts, and requiring a knife to cut apart the impossibly tight figure-eight tie-in knot. Our original plan called for increasing the fall factor up to 1, but due to the severity of the .5 falls, we cancelled the harder falls and decreased the factor to .25, more in line with what you’d experience in a typical fall at a crag where you are placing pro every body length. The result? Lower impact forces.

LESSONS TO REMEMBER
1. Higher fall factors generate higher impact forces.
2. Avoid falling low on a climb, where there’s not much rope in the system and the fall factor will be high.
3. Place frequent protection early on a pitch. This will lower the distance you fall, reducing the fall factor.
4. Ditch your ego, and place protection immediately after each belay. Failure to do so can result in a factor 2 fall onto the belay—a nightmare scenario.
5. Rope drag can increase the fall factor because it causes uneven rope loading: The rope on the leader side of the rope-drag point can take most of the full load, while the rope on the belayer’s side can receive almost no load. Use slings to minimize drag and keep the fall factor as low as possible.
6. If possible, after a jolting fall, untie and switch ends of the rope.

 

 

WEIGHTY ISSUE
Given a choice, most of us would drop a five-pound weight on our toe, instead of a 10-pound weight. We prefer the lighter weight because we know thatit will inflict less pain than the heavier weight. The same premise applies to climbing: Heavier climbers hurt their ropes and protection (and belayers)more than lighter climbers. To confirm our theory, we again turned to the falls at the crag.

Here, we find that a 145-pound climber (me) hit the rope softer than a 200-pound climber (Tyler). In three similar falls, I registered 1,400, 1,550 and 1,500, while Tyler registered 1,500, 1,600 and 1,900 pounds force. (The UIAA/CE tests require a 176-pound weight.)

These results aren’t scientifically valid—every fall yanked the belayer around differently even though he was anchored, and our falling trajectories varied depending on whether the “victim” let go and dropped or sprung out and then swung in and smacked the rock—but the rope manufacturer PMI has conducted lab tests that support the premise.

In 39 drop tests that mirror UIAA/CE rope drop tests, PMI increased the test weight from 180 incrementally all the way up to 300 pounds. Their research shows that heavier climbers fall harder. Precisely, in their drops, a 180-pound weight registered a maximum impact force of 1,866 pounds force, measured on the “climber.” When the weight increased to 200 pounds the impact force went to 2,035 pounds force—10 percent higher. The 250-pound weight generated 2,499 pounds force and the 300-pound weight smacked with a rocking 3,046 pounds force. Heavy climbers can’t do much about the weight (other than strip off excess rack and maybe ease off on the pie), but you shouldn’t bury your head in the sand. Your weight is a safety issue. Act accordingly.
 

LESSONS TO REMEMBER
1. The heavier you are, the harder you fall.
2. Heavier climbers should consider fatter ropes with low impact-force ratings, which can take more abuse than thinner ropes. Keep in mind, however, that thicker ropes usually have higher maximum impact force ratings than thinner ropes.
3. Heavyweights should beef up all anchors, place protection more often and make sure the belayer is able to take the load.

Impact forces and fall factors are two components that come into play when boot rubber meets the rock. They aren’t however, the entire story. How you belay, whether static, dynamic, anchored, not anchored, is another vital variable. 

Reader's Commentary:

Don't want to use Facebook, but still want to comment? We have you covered:

Add Your Comments to this article:
 

 
Hello